Yesterday Carolee, our Town's ACO, and I travelled to Hamden to attend Precious Cargo, a conference about animal transport. Held by the highly regarded, AWFCT, I expected to learn a lot since I've only worked on one transport so far.
The Quinnipiac School of Law, Grand Court Room, lived up to its' name. With cathedral ceilings, custom shaped windows and lots of stunning details in a variety of carved wood, it certainly felt like a place where something important was about to happen. The room was filled with participants. What surprised me was that there were a fair number of men in attendance. I expected lots of ladies wearing shirts festooned with cat or dog artwork or rescue group promotional t-shirts. I teased Carolee that she should have worn her uniform, which is basically a police offers' uniform and a special patch added. She was dressed in a cute outfit and wore pretty sandals, a far cry from the lumbering poly-blend she's usually trapped in.
Everyone was nicely attired and professional looking. I was even more impressed and felt maybe I should have spiffed up even more than I did.
If I was a proper reporter, instead of a blogger/author, I'd tell you about each and every panelist and go on and on in great detail, until you passed out or just skipped to the end where I talk about what I learned.
The thing is, although most of the panelists had a great deal of experience and background in their particular fields; law, Massachusetts transport laws, as well as a woman from a dog rescue who uses transports and the owner of a transport company, they didn't talk much about cats. In fact a few folks had to bring up the question of "what about CATS?" One of the panelists referred to them as the "C" word, which I found highly offensive. Another basically said that there's no real reason to import cats since you can get what you want here and transporting "short haired plain jane" cats was a waste of resources. Tell that to Huggy, Dash, Snuggles, Angel, Pumpkin, Spyder and so many more!
Here's my "plain jane" boring cat that didn't deserve to be saved because she was from out of state.
We were even asked to PROMISE not to fight with each other or be rude because apparently this is a very volatile subject. There are folks that think it's wrong to go out of state because those special breed/cute dogs (forget cats because they don't count) prevent families from adopting pit bulls. Yes, this came up and and great length-which has nothing to do with transporting or laws. A lot of people were stating that their shelter might only have pitties in their building but if that was all they had, through education, they could place these dogs in homes, but if there was competition from labs or what have you, then the pits were put down. This is a topic for another conference, not what we are talking about. It was supposed to be about laws, health and safety issues.
There was a lot of discussion about law. The problem is it was discussions about the laws in MA and their possible effect in CT and laws that could have been passed in CT, but didn't make it through the last session. What is to be learned from laws that didn't happen? What is to be learned about the big law change in MA? That it will force some bad folks to try to sell dogs in CT for $25 w/out proper health certs. This could have been an email to all of us as something to watch out for, not part of a conference.
I'm really sorry to say this, but because there was so much talk about laws that aren't going to happen or have happened in other states, my eyes began to roll into the back of my head.
Kyle Peterson, who runs P.E.T.S. was very professional and helpful. I met one of his competitors who also spoke very highly of his reputation. I spoke with Kyle about doing cat transports and he was very courteous and interested. Heck, it's more business for him and he has a separate section of his trailers just for cats! Finally, at least I found someone who is willing to work with us and give us a good rate.
I also talked to a few other people and honestly, that was the best part of the conference for me; meeting the attendees. They were bright, smart, compassionate, funny folks who all wanted to make things right. They stated some facts that the dog imports weren't causing a problem with adoptions and, in fact, were helping. One shelter stated that because they had a more interesting selection of animals, word got out and folks not only adopted those imported dogs, but senior dogs, special needs dogs and pitties. When they stopped doing transports, their adoption numbers declined.
Carolee's statement gets displayed on the board. They cut out the part that made the ACO on the panel look bad because she said that you can't transfer dogs from one town to another, but that's false. You CAN transport them if you do the proper paperwork, but no one wants to bother.
But what OF cats? Yes, there are TONS of cats in CT. I should help every single one of them and not help cats out of state. The problem is that we can only safely handle cats up to about 5 months of age and that's it. After that they can become a serious burden to our home foster network. If that's the case and that's what people want-if they are set on finding a kitten, as so many adopters are, and it's winter here and we don't HAVE kittens, but in the south they still have an overpopulation problem, then why don't I save a few of them?
Sure, I've gotten some folks, a very few, to adopt adults, but I've also seen people with children, most often, adamant that they have a young cat or kitten. Some have told me they've looked and looked all over the state for their ideal kitten and if no shelter has it, they will wait. It does make me feel a bit sleezy. I haven't sorted my thoughts out on this completely, but geez...if I have room in my house and it's winter and I don't have local fosters who need my help, then I'm going to look elsewhere. I can help another 30 or so kittens find a home until we get busy again. I've also got two potential foster homes who will also work with me this winter. We just need to make sure we don't break the bank and the cats are healthy before they get here
That was my biggest disappointment yesterday-there wasn't much said about how to maintain health of animals in transport. I was hoping this was more about "how to" than the law. Huggy came to me with bad ear mites and flea dirt. There is no reason that should have happened. Tonight I saw a tiny bald spot on her head. She's been here for three weeks. Does she have ringworm??? If so, I am screwed because she is well out of quarantine. She's due to see the Vet tomorrow to check on how her mastitis is resolving so I'll have her checked for ringworm, too.
I'm struggling to find what is the "right" thing to do for all these cats in need. I know I can do more than just throw money at the problem. I dove in, head first and some times I'm barely treading water and other times I'm just swimming along, fine. This IS difficult, emotional work, but the rewards are beyond my expectations.
Perhaps that should have been one of the key points yesterday? If you know that pulling some animals from "down south" allows that shelter to focus on other things, such as a good spay/neuter program, instead of throwing animals into a gas chamber, then isn't that, in the long run, more helpful than just staying in Connecticut? How rewarding is that to ALL of us, if we help each other out and eventually find some balance? Is that what we're doing here? Maybe so.
Comments
I struggle with this myself -
I struggle with this myself - I don't foster or transport animals, but I do give money, and I always give it locally. Why? Because they are local cats and dogs, and if we can clear a space around a shelter of unwanted animals, it allows animals from farther away to come in. But I believe that every animal deserves a home, and if it means bringing an animal across borders and possibly take a place of a local animal, well, that animal now has a chance when it didn't before. Also, I think animal transport sends a message to the overcrowded shelters that they need to do something and there are people willing to help them do it.
Also, every privately run shelter makes their own rules, and sets where their focus is going to be. No one outside of that organization can say how an animal is rescued as long as the animal is healthy, has a real chance at a happy life (some shelters tend to "stash" cats), and all laws are being followed. Everybody is in this together, and fighting about who is worthy to save isn't going to save a life.
As angry and hurt as it makes
As angry and hurt as it makes me, the sad truth is that cats are second-class citizens compared to dogs and exotics. I don't think that cats are inherently better than other domesticated animals and should therefore get special treatment, but they should have as much of a chance as any other companion. In one of the towns here, the town board actually changed their Animal Control Officer to a Dog Control Officer so whoever was in that position could ignore any other animal involved in a neglect or cruelty case. Don't get me started on the strays.
Lately, there has been attention drawn to the fact that many groups in the north are rescuing southern animals. I'll leave it to people more knowledgeable than I to answer that question. I'm going to wonder out loud (and am interested to know what others think) if the reason groups that do out of state rescues have higher overall adoption rates is beacuse their volunteers feel like they're making a positive difference and can therefore stay enthusiastic and positive about the hometown animals they've helped rescue. We're in it to help the animals, and if we get our hands slapped over helping pets like Huggy because they aren't in our immediate area, we're going to get run down, burned out and discouraged - and can we all agree that we need all of the encouragement we can get?
Instead of legislating what animals can be rescued and from where, how about they work at spay/neuter education and low-cost programs? I know people who are barely getting by, but take care of their animals at home AND at the vet. In the cold terms of government, these folks are helping to take care of the pet overpopulation for the municipality, why shouldn't they have access to low-cost spay/neuter? According to ASPCA figures, one unaltered female cat can produce 420,000 new cats (she has kittens;her kittens have kittens; their kittens have kittens; you get the point) over 7 years. ONE spay prevents these unwanted kittens from suffering terribly and saves municipalities big bucks in animal control and public health (rabies is real).
Robin, I have to hope that our work, and the work of the people who belong to this site (as well as the other rescuers who take this work to heart) will help change attitudes and that the people we reach will pass it on and make the United States a truly humane nation. It may not happen during our lives, but if we persevere and don't let the things we experience in rescue beat us down, it can happen.
With all of the challenges our nation and our communities face, it's more important than ever that we keep working for those that can't defend themselves.
Sorry if this was rambling and veered off-topic, but we can't let the naysayers get us down!
A life is a life, IMO :-)
To me, it doesn't matter in the end whether I saved a life in my own backyard or someone else's backyard, as the last line of the starfish story says "I made a difference to that one". I get frustrated with the argument about pitbulls not being adopted because of out-of-state dogs being brought in, this is so not true. Someone who wants to get a pitty will get one, someone who is afraid of them, doesn't think they can handle one, or whatever, will not, regardless of the selection of adoptable animals. Should the overabundance of different breed and highly adoptable animals sitting in shelters all over the country, not be saved, until every last pitbull is adopted? it makes no sense. I used to think that spay/neuter was THE answer, period. Then I read statistics that said each year, American families will bring in 17 million new pets to their homes. By anyone's estimate, that's 4-5 times the number of adoptable pets being put down in shelters each year. Trying to get my head around this, puts education now at the top of my list - getting people to understand why adopting from a shelter, any shelter (even if it is out of state!) should be the first place they look, not the last.
I don't accept their argument
It seems to me as if the complaining about the misguidedness and insignificance of efforts to save individual animals is more about their wanting to feel comfortable in their world. They have plans to take care of this, if only you forget about the fact that thousands upon thousands of animals are being killed for no good reason elsewhere.
There are many people trying to help, using different approaches. Anything that people do that helps animals and fosters support for the cause of animals should be encouraged. The problems are overwhelming. Who knows what ideas will come together to show us how to vastly improve the tragic situation we have now?
Some approaches will prove better than others. Some efforts end up being misguided and unhelpful. But until a comprehensive, humane approach in in place for dealing with cats, dogs, and other domestic animals who lack people to care for them, I am wary of being told to be conservative, to be sensible, to realize that personal efforts to save single animals mean little.
Amen to that.
Amen to that.
transferring in kitties from other States
Just wanted to add my two cents. I do not believe that the majority of the people at the conference harbored any anti-cat feelings. Many of us are big time cat rescuers. What I got from my conversations with attendees and how I personally feel is this:
There is no shortage of homeless cats and kittens in CT. Our shelter gets at least 50 calls per week from people looking to place their own cats or stray cats/kittens. We normally house up to 80 cats, and that's pushing our limit. We currently have twice that number. We find cats in boxes in our parking lot. And many people are leaving their cats behind when they move. If we kept up with our cat intake waiting list, I would not be exaggerating if I said that we would have hundreds of cats on the list. Our shelter does what we can to help people get their cats spayed/neutered and we are also involved in a program that provides free spay/neuter for feral cats, but the numbers of calls we continue to receive about homeless kittens makes us feel like we're barely making a dent in the overpopulation problem. I love cats as much as anyone and I do my best to help as many as I can, but the idea of more cats being brought up to CT when shelters and rescue groups don't have room for the ones that are already here doesn't sit well with me. Just my opinion. I respect opposing views. Thanks for listening.
It's all valid...but...
...you can say the same thing about the LINE of about 50 people I saw last Sunday, waiting to get dogs off a transport truck, filled with DOGS from the south. They're doing the same thing-taking up homes/space that CT dogs could fill. I have to handle calls from folks all the time about local cats, too and we help our neighbors first. That said, we have serious restrictions as to what we can take in-like NO ADULTS, so if I can't find kittens locally, I'll go elsewhere. Those animals need homes, too and if my hands are tied because I don't have a shelter, then I'm still going to save a life-regardless of where that life came from.
Thanks for sharing your feelings about this topic. I realize it's a hot-button and hopefully we can work it out and not have to have this discussion some day-when they all get the homes they need.
Add new comment