Images on this website have been digitally watermarked with ownership and usage information. Digimarc and the Digimarc logo are registered trademarks of Digimarc Corporation. The "Digimarc-Enabled" Web Button is a trademark of Digimarc Corporation, used with permission.
Contact the Author
Comments? Questions? Fan Mail? Having Trouble Registering for a Free Account or Posting? Contact Robin Here
this will result in mass euthansia of cats and kittens because now potential homes will not be allowed to adopt if they already have 3 cats and there will be nowhere for these unwanted cats to go.
I foresee a major legal battle and repercussions that they never intended.
This is a perfect example of good intentions going horribly wrong. I am guessing that this "law" was intended to stop hoarders or those who can not properly take care of multiple animals... I can't imagine that they intended to increase the number of animals that won't be able to find homes... distressing.
I really dislike this kind of law. And I get the idea it was enacted against this one rescuer, not as a general purpose law. My own town in Washington state restricts pet ownership to 4 animals, so with 5 cats and a dog I'm in violation. They are now requiring licensing.. so if I license am I turning myself in?
The real deal seems to be that unless a neighbor complains about you the town doesn't seek violaters out, but I do worry.
In my case, the area has a bit of a rodent infestation. All my neighbors welcome my cats because they chase the more objectionable critters off.
Great idea: I'm a childless widow who pays more than 10k a year in property taxes each year.Why not require a license for people with more than 3 kids? Day care license? Could generate a good sum of money for the schools.
Preposterous? Yes. But so is passing a reactionary law based on the irresponsible actions of one individual. Certainly this woman could be sited under some existing nuisance law. My significant other and I have a combined 6 rescue cats. All well-cared for (my Hurricane Katrina rescue cat needs a $1200 operation this week; it was either that or shocks for my car - guess which I chose?!) All the people I know who have more than 3 cats are kind, caring people trying to give abandoned, sick or abused animals a chance at a happy life. (and most of us keep our cats indoors). To penalize people like us shows a fundamental lack of humanity. I'm glad I don't live in Dudley.
Cat owners rise up and claw the stuffing out of injustice!
Comments
Annnnnndddddd
this will result in mass euthansia of cats and kittens because now potential homes will not be allowed to adopt if they already have 3 cats and there will be nowhere for these unwanted cats to go.
I foresee a major legal battle and repercussions that they never intended.
Idiots.
bad, bad
This is a perfect example of good intentions going horribly wrong. I am guessing that this "law" was intended to stop hoarders or those who can not properly take care of multiple animals... I can't imagine that they intended to increase the number of animals that won't be able to find homes... distressing.
I really dislike this kind of
I really dislike this kind of law. And I get the idea it was enacted against this one rescuer, not as a general purpose law. My own town in Washington state restricts pet ownership to 4 animals, so with 5 cats and a dog I'm in violation. They are now requiring licensing.. so if I license am I turning myself in?
The real deal seems to be that unless a neighbor complains about you the town doesn't seek violaters out, but I do worry.
In my case, the area has a bit of a rodent infestation. All my neighbors welcome my cats because they chase the more objectionable critters off.
Great idea: I'm a childless
Great idea: I'm a childless widow who pays more than 10k a year in property taxes each year.Why not require a license for people with more than 3 kids? Day care license? Could generate a good sum of money for the schools.
Preposterous? Yes. But so is passing a reactionary law based on the irresponsible actions of one individual. Certainly this woman could be sited under some existing nuisance law. My significant other and I have a combined 6 rescue cats. All well-cared for (my Hurricane Katrina rescue cat needs a $1200 operation this week; it was either that or shocks for my car - guess which I chose?!) All the people I know who have more than 3 cats are kind, caring people trying to give abandoned, sick or abused animals a chance at a happy life. (and most of us keep our cats indoors). To penalize people like us shows a fundamental lack of humanity. I'm glad I don't live in Dudley.
Cat owners rise up and claw the stuffing out of injustice!
Add new comment